Logo: Project Citizen

Lesson 13: What Was the Anti-Federalist Position in the Debate about Ratification?

Image

Lesson Purpose

Most of the delegates at the Philadelphia Convention signed the Constitution on September 17, 1787. Their product would become the law of the land only if ratified by at least nine of the thirteen states. This lesson explains the process of ratification and the opposition that erupted immediately after the draft Constitution became public. Supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves Federalists and labeled their opponents Anti-Federalists. The names stuck, even though the opponents argued that they—not the Constitution's supporters—were the real believers in a truly "federal" system, a confederation of equal states.

Lesson Objectives

When you have finished this lesson, you should  be able to
  • explain why the Anti-Federalists opposed ratifying the Constitution,
  • explain the role of the Anti-Federalists in proposing a bill of rights and to identify other contributions their views have made toward interpreting the  Constitution, and
  • evaluate, take, and defend a position on the validity and relevance of Anti-Federalist arguments.

Lesson Terms

Anti-Federalists
Opponents to ratification of the U.S. Constitution who believed that it gave excessive power to the federal government and failed to protect the rights and liberties of the people.
Bill of Rights
ratification

Lesson Biographies

Gerry, Elbridge (1744-1814 CE)
Gerry was born to a wealthy merchant family in Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard and was a staunch supporter of Samuel Adams. Gerry was active in protests against British policies and was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. He often changed his mind about political issues. For example, after Shays' Rebellion, he spoke against giving the common people too much power, but he still argued for yearly elections and against giving the Senate, which was not accountable to the people, too much power. Gerry refused to sign the Constitution and worked against ratification. Throughout his life, he served in a variety of offices including that of vice president.
Locke, John (1632-1704 CE)
Madison, James (1751-1836 CE)
Martin, Luther (1748-1826 CE)
Warren, Mercy Otis (1728-1814 CE)
Yates, Robert (1738-1801 CE)

Lesson Primary Sources

Brutus No. 1

Anti-Federalist argument for a federal republic with authority resting in the state governments. Brutus argues that the provisions in the proposed constitution are general and comprehensive enough to endanger states with irrelevancy, with specific regard to the necessary and proper clause and the difficulty of a republic governing over diverse interests.

Access the Material

Brutus No. 2
Brutus No. 7
Centinel No. 5
The Fallacies of the Freeman Detected by a [Pennsylvania] Farmer
Federal Farmer No. 4
Federal Farmer No. 7
Federal Farmer No. 8
Federal Farmer No. 11
Federal Farmer No. 15
Federal Farmer No. 17
Federal Farmer No. 18
Luther Martin's Speech to the Maryland House of Delegates 1789
An Old Whig No. 2
Patrick Henry Speech, June 5, 1788
Ratification of the Constitution by the state of North Carolina
United States Bill of Rights
United States Constitution
About

CCE LogoThis site is brought to you by the Center for Civic Education. The Center's mission is to promote an enlightened and responsible citizenry committed to democratic principles and actively engaged in the practice of democracy. The Center has reached more than 30 million students and their teachers since 1965. Learn more.

Center for Civic Education

5115 Douglas Fir Road, Suite J
Calabasas, CA 91302

  Phone: (818) 591-9321

  Email: web@civiced.org

  Media Inquiries: cce@civiced.org

  Website: www.civiced.org

© Center for Civic Education